The weight of teaching
Jul. 14th, 2005 07:21 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Over the past few days, I have come to realize just how much responsibility teaching puts on my shoulders. On Monday, I had to grade papers for the first time. With math, this is not so difficult - the answer is either right or wrong, and the questions I asked did not really lend themselves to partial credit - though that will complicate things next time. But when grading essays, things get much harder. There is no objective way to say which paper is better than another. I tried to quantify it. I tried to use a rubric.
For those who don't know what a rubric is - I sometimes forget that it is not part of everyone's everyday vocabulary - just mine - it looks something like this:
Outline Organization
1 Missing Poor
2 Incomplete Getting there
3 Great Wonderful
But add a few more categories, and a better description for each number.
So I tried that system, but I realized it did not quite match with my idea of which students were writing "good" essays. And then I had to tweak the system. And I had to read each paper multiple times. And it took me hours.
After all that, I still end up feeling like some of my decisions were a bit arbitrary. And these possibly arbitrary decisions determine what grades some of my students got - the difference between an A and a B, a B and a C. This is a big responsibility.
But I have learned that teachers also bear a different kind of weight. Teachers get approached with many questions. Some of these questions reach beyond the realm of education.
Yesterday, a ten-year-old asked: "What's a suicide bomber?" She then added, "What's suicide? So-and-so told me I should know already."
Without really thinking, I answered something along the lines of: "Suicide is when a person kills themself. A suicide bomber is someone who wants to kill other people so badly that he is willing to kill himself along with them."
It was only afterward that I paused to think about whether or not I should have answered at all - though, upon reflection, I decided that if she was asking, I should answer. She knew the context - she asked me if I had heard about what happened in London - and she had read the phrase in a newspaper - I am guessing it was in a headline.
What to say after answering is an even tougher call. Do I reassure her? Do I tell her these are very bad people? I didn't say anything of substance. In retrospect, I think I should have asked how hearing the definition made her feel, what was going through her head. Maybe then I would have know what she needed to hear next.
I suppose teachers are not the only ones who face these questions and decisions. Parents do too, of course. But in some ways, it's more complicated as a teacher. For one thing, I have known my students for little more than a week. And then there are the parents themselves - if I make a bad decision, or a decision that they think is wrong, I have them to answer to.
For those who don't know what a rubric is - I sometimes forget that it is not part of everyone's everyday vocabulary - just mine - it looks something like this:
Outline Organization
1 Missing Poor
2 Incomplete Getting there
3 Great Wonderful
But add a few more categories, and a better description for each number.
So I tried that system, but I realized it did not quite match with my idea of which students were writing "good" essays. And then I had to tweak the system. And I had to read each paper multiple times. And it took me hours.
After all that, I still end up feeling like some of my decisions were a bit arbitrary. And these possibly arbitrary decisions determine what grades some of my students got - the difference between an A and a B, a B and a C. This is a big responsibility.
But I have learned that teachers also bear a different kind of weight. Teachers get approached with many questions. Some of these questions reach beyond the realm of education.
Yesterday, a ten-year-old asked: "What's a suicide bomber?" She then added, "What's suicide? So-and-so told me I should know already."
Without really thinking, I answered something along the lines of: "Suicide is when a person kills themself. A suicide bomber is someone who wants to kill other people so badly that he is willing to kill himself along with them."
It was only afterward that I paused to think about whether or not I should have answered at all - though, upon reflection, I decided that if she was asking, I should answer. She knew the context - she asked me if I had heard about what happened in London - and she had read the phrase in a newspaper - I am guessing it was in a headline.
What to say after answering is an even tougher call. Do I reassure her? Do I tell her these are very bad people? I didn't say anything of substance. In retrospect, I think I should have asked how hearing the definition made her feel, what was going through her head. Maybe then I would have know what she needed to hear next.
I suppose teachers are not the only ones who face these questions and decisions. Parents do too, of course. But in some ways, it's more complicated as a teacher. For one thing, I have known my students for little more than a week. And then there are the parents themselves - if I make a bad decision, or a decision that they think is wrong, I have them to answer to.
Suicide Bombers, & Suicide
Date: 2005-07-14 12:58 pm (UTC)I think that's a really good answer. It's simple, but it explains a lot.
>Do I reassure her? Do I tell her these are very bad people?
Well, if it comes up again, make sure that you make the distinction - suicide bombers are always evil because they're killing other people. But people who commit suicide do so for a variety of reasons, by far the most common being mental illness, and I think it's important to emphasize that that's not evil, it's an illness. Because I know of elementary school teachers who spoke of suicide as evil, and really hurt a little girl in their class whose close relative died after a long battle with depression.
Re: Suicide Bombers, & Suicide
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-07-14 02:06 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Suicide Bombers, & Suicide
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-07-14 05:17 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Suicide Bombers, & Suicide
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-07-14 05:46 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Suicide Bombers, & Suicide
From:Re: Suicide Bombers, & Suicide
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-07-15 01:15 pm (UTC) - ExpandMental Illness
From:Re: Suicide Bombers, & Suicide
From:Re: Evil, Mental Illness, and OCD
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-07-15 10:06 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Evil, Mental Illness, and OCD
From:Evil Deeds vs. Evil People
From:Re: Evil Deeds vs. Evil People
From:Re: Suicide Bombers, & Suicide
From:Re: Suicide Bombers, & Suicide
From:Re: Suicide Bombers, & Suicide
From:Re: Suicide Bombers, & Suicide
From:Re: Suicide Bombers, & Suicide
From:Re: Suicide Bombers, & Suicide
From:Impressive
Date: 2005-07-14 01:54 pm (UTC)Taylweaver wrote:
For those who don't know what a rubric is... it looks something like this:
...and I always thought that a rubric was a Rubik's cube in the shape of a brick... :-)
But in all seriousness, it sounds like you're doing a very impressive job. You have really hit the nail on the head in your point that in answering questions, you bear the responsibility of parents, though you have known your students for about a week. (And when, God willing, you get a permanent job, the turn-around rate will still be a year.)
In terms of the suicide question-- what do you mean when you say that it reaches beyond the realm of education? It sure sounds like education to me. Do you mean that you were not prepared for such questions at TC?
Furthermore, you wrote:
...the difference between an A and a B, a B and a C.
Hmm... When I was in elementary school (in the NYC public school system), they had a system of letter grades that was something like E (excellent), G (good), S (satisfactory), U (unsatisfactory). I think there was also something between G and S. Then, they tried changing it to something like A(rea of exceptional strength) - P(assing) - U(nsatisfactory). Now, it sounds like they're using As, Bs, and Cs-- unless, of course, your school is not a public school.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-14 04:10 pm (UTC)And I think you gave a reasonable answer to a tough question. I still remember my third-grade teacher explaining to the class (I forget the specific context) what stereotypes were and what they could cause. Teachers have to explain difficult things, sometimes, but they can (and you will be) be a good, reliable source of information, and provide a safe space for kids to ask those questions. And if another question is something you feel would be inappropriate to answer, you could always tell them that might be a better question for their parents to answer, or some such thing. the kids I used to mentor and tutor occasionally asked some... interesting things, jaded little middle schoolers that they were. And then there was the one who didn't like us so told her parents we were telling them about sex and abortions, which in that part of Indiana would have been an extra big no-no. Fortunately no one believed her...
Anyhoo, best of luck with the teaching. I have great confidence in you.
Re: Grading
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-07-14 06:00 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Grading
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-07-18 12:53 pm (UTC) - Expandsuicides and religion
Date: 2005-07-17 02:06 pm (UTC)I always wondered about this. According to the Torah, if you know someone is from amaleik, you must kill them - man, woman or child. Just now, too bad that we don't really know who they are, otherwise we'd have to slaughter them all. In a kind of jihad. And about suicide bombers, isn't there some story about Shimshon Hagibor who died while killing a bunch of plishtim ? How is it that "we" are different from "them" again ?
Re: suicides and religion
From:Re: suicides and religion
From:Re: suicides and religion
From:Re: suicides and religion
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-07-19 02:38 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: suicides and religion
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-07-19 11:21 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: suicides and religion
From: