The weight of teaching

[taylweaver]

Over the past few days, I have come to realize just how much responsibility teaching puts on my shoulders. On Monday, I had to grade papers for the first time. With math, this is not so difficult - the answer is either right or wrong, and the questions I asked did not really lend themselves to partial credit - though that will complicate things next time. But when grading essays, things get much harder. There is no objective way to say which paper is better than another. I tried to quantify it. I tried to use a rubric.

For those who don't know what a rubric is - I sometimes forget that it is not part of everyone's everyday vocabulary - just mine - it looks something like this:

Outline Organization

1 Missing Poor

2 Incomplete Getting there

3 Great Wonderful

But add a few more categories, and a better description for each number.

So I tried that system, but I realized it did not quite match with my idea of which students were writing "good" essays. And then I had to tweak the system. And I had to read each paper multiple times. And it took me hours.

After all that, I still end up feeling like some of my decisions were a bit arbitrary. And these possibly arbitrary decisions determine what grades some of my students got - the difference between an A and a B, a B and a C. This is a big responsibility.

But I have learned that teachers also bear a different kind of weight. Teachers get approached with many questions. Some of these questions reach beyond the realm of education.

Yesterday, a ten-year-old asked: "What's a suicide bomber?" She then added, "What's suicide? So-and-so told me I should know already."

Without really thinking, I answered something along the lines of: "Suicide is when a person kills themself. A suicide bomber is someone who wants to kill other people so badly that he is willing to kill himself along with them."

It was only afterward that I paused to think about whether or not I should have answered at all - though, upon reflection, I decided that if she was asking, I should answer. She knew the context - she asked me if I had heard about what happened in London - and she had read the phrase in a newspaper - I am guessing it was in a headline.

What to say after answering is an even tougher call. Do I reassure her? Do I tell her these are very bad people? I didn't say anything of substance. In retrospect, I think I should have asked how hearing the definition made her feel, what was going through her head. Maybe then I would have know what she needed to hear next.

I suppose teachers are not the only ones who face these questions and decisions. Parents do too, of course. But in some ways, it's more complicated as a teacher. For one thing, I have known my students for little more than a week. And then there are the parents themselves - if I make a bad decision, or a decision that they think is wrong, I have them to answer to.

Comments

suicides and religion

[onionsoupmix.livejournal.com]

As a whole, I have a respect for other religions and for their devoted practitioners - but only as far as those practices involve doing no harm to other people

I always wondered about this. According to the Torah, if you know someone is from amaleik, you must kill them - man, woman or child. Just now, too bad that we don't really know who they are, otherwise we'd have to slaughter them all. In a kind of jihad. And about suicide bombers, isn't there some story about Shimshon Hagibor who died while killing a bunch of plishtim ? How is it that "we" are different from "them" again ?

Re: suicides and religion

[taylweaver.livejournal.com]

I always found it interesting that, despite some commandments in the Torah that tell us to kill people for various reasons, we always seem to find a way around it - like saying that amalek no longer exists, so there is no one for us to kill. Or finding excuse after excuse to avoid actually giving someone capital punishment.

And yes, I have thought about Shimshon in that way. Not quite sure what my take is on it.

If anyone else has any thoughts, however...

Re: suicides and religion

[taylweaver.livejournal.com]

And by the way - I am curious about your subject line - did you mean to say suicide bombers/attacks and religioun? Because, as has been noted above, there is a big difference between that idea, and the one you invoke by writing "suicides" by itself.

Re: suicides and religion

[margavriel.livejournal.com]

Shimshon?! You want to take Shimshon as a role model for a Jew (or for any human)?! He slept around, he lied, he cheated his in-laws, he revealed military secrets (about his hair) to the enemy Mata Hari (Delilah), and he ended up as "suicide bomber". Not exactly a model life.

Re: suicides and religion

[(Anonymous)]

suicide isn't necessarily evil, or mentally ill; it depends on the worthiness and the urgency of the cause

Re: suicides and religion

[(Anonymous)]

If it's mental illness, there is no 'worthy cause'. Don't romanticize suicide.

Re: suicides and religion

[taylweaver.livejournal.com]

I am not quite clear on what you are trying to say - are you defending Shimshon, or talking in more general terms? I hope you are not equating suicide in the general sense with suicide bombings, etc.

Also, I now have two consecutive anonymous posts here - and I am wondering who is posting.